De meningen ge-uit door medewerkers en studenten van de TU Delft en de commentaren die zijn gegeven reflecteren niet perse de mening(en) van de TU Delft. De TU Delft is dan ook niet verantwoordelijk voor de inhoud van hetgeen op de TU Delft weblogs zichtbaar is. Wel vindt de TU Delft het belangrijk - en ook waarde toevoegend - dat medewerkers en studenten op deze, door de TU Delft gefaciliteerde, omgeving hun mening kunnen geven.

On crystals with five-fold axis

Five-fold symmetry axis is not compatible with translational symmetry and therefore with crystal order, that’s it. To be read in textbooks, and all clever boys and girls do know this. This year Nobel prize in Chemistry celebrates an experimental disproval of this mathematical statement, a remarkable discovery of quasi-crystals, the discovery made accidentally, met first with disbelief and them with euphoria, and almost forgotten now.

Quite some time ago Leonid Levitov showed me a fresh-pressed journal with a diffraction pattern photograph that clearly manifested this five-fold axis. Being a reasonably clever boy, I reacted with expected furiously, citing the textbook. In a couple of weeks, I listened to the talk where Kalugin, Kitaev and Levitov presented the first theory of quasi-crystal order, a break-neck idea of hidden higher-dimensionality of the material. (Actually, I still remember some details of the talk but can’t recall who of the three gave it.) All the authors were PhD students(Correction: was reminded on 9-10-2011 that they were master students)), all were below twenty-five. It looked like golden times of physics came back.

Well, after a while other ideas took over. The authors kept working in the field for a while and contribute a lot.

I find it exteremly unjust that their contributions have not been even mentioned in the scientific blurb that explained the prize. Well, these chemists remain chemists…

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

© 2011 TU Delft